01 2020 This allergy has appeared  Algeria WhatsApp Number List  over the years. At the beginning like everyone else, what pride we feel when our boss invites us to participate in a meeting. It’s class, we are happy, we will be able to shine and be noticed. That’s at the beginning, and it’s good because it nourishes our recognition. And then as with everything, as we go along, we get used to it and we discover that ultimately everything does not go as we would like and by dint of consuming it, we make it indigestion Overdose of meetings Me, this allergy appeared in my previous functions , the joy of large groups, and the suffering that goes with it. 37 meetings per week, it had become my job, from Monday morning 8 a.m. to Friday 5 p.m. ” What do you do in life ?

Uh, meetings> <“. The advantage is that it trains and that we learn from it for the future. On this occasion, I discovered meetings, normal, nice, which progress, less nice, very political, which do not progress and even meetings which decline! How it is possible ? Well quite simply when the conclusions of the previous meeting were not suitable, the organizer had the art of reformulating at the beginning of the meeting different conclusions and since no one rose to dispute it was a given. A whole art that comes close to the politician. This rush to meet had the same effect on me as for many people, it made me lose the SENSE and the pleasure in my work, because during this meeting time,

We Can Do Otherwise

we just have our work to do outside of these meetings. Three people in meetings – In the foreground, hands on a notepad; two Mediaveille employees in the background Let’s work on the causes of ill-being at work We talk more and more about well-being at work and often by highlighting “gadgets” such as table football, fruit in the office, sport etc. But to develop well-being, it would be smarter and above all more effective to deal with the causes that generate ill-being for employees. And the subject of meetings is one of the causes when the company manages them badly. Not the only one of course, but it is one of the elements. When a meeting is: Late Badly lived Or we don’t listen to each other Too long Too many Poorly prepared That we don’t know what decision we’re waiting for

Algeria-Whatsapp-Number-List
 

That we don’t make decisions when leaving Or that validated actions are not followed by facts. These are all reasons that will help manage demotivation and more or less unhappiness for everyone by slowing down the proper functioning of the company. The difficulty is twofold for the company, when people are invited, they live it badly and when they are not invited, they are frustrated because they are not invited to participate. In everyone’s mind, it’s only the important people who have meetings. So mechanically the system is self-sustaining, everyone thinks it is good to organize it, and therefore we do more and more, and we live it more and more badly. We can do otherwise Already, we can limit the number of people solicited by just asking the question whether they have a real interest in participating and the value of the contribution they will be able to make.

Meeting Vs Individual Point

There is a formula that I like, that I discovered in the book The 25th hour to optimize your working time and be more efficient, it’s 0, 1, 2, 3: 0 start-up delay 1 single screen (we close the phones and computers) 2 pizzas (to define the maximum number of people) 3 for 30 minutes maximum meeting time. Denmark and the Anglo-Saxon countries are very straddling the principle. In France it is more difficult, we are Latin, we need to speak ???? But today, there are many solutions already to avoid doing it. A good file shared on Drive, for example, allows everyone to fill it according to their schedule and take the time necessary to enrich it. We are not all the same, and for some, it is not easy (if not impossible) to have 15 ideas per hour.

Meetings can also be made more enjoyable and interactive with solutions like Klaxoon , which helps develop the participatory format and collective intelligence. Meetings at MV Group; in the foreground, collaborator in blue, from behind; in the background, four collaborators, blurred background Meeting vs individual point Personally, I have favored the individual point for years . We are more focused on the subjects concerning his interlocutor, the answers are fast, adapted, the pace can also be adjusted, if he likes to go fast, we go quickly, if we need to settle down, we take more time. To this operation, there is a strong constraint, the time and energy that it imposes (we also ramble a little) but I especially see the advantages:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.